# Invariant Points *Revision and Worksheets*

## What you need to know

When we transform a shape – using translations, reflections, rotations, enlargements, or some combination of those 4 – there are sometimes points on the shape that end up in the same place they started. These are known as invariant points. You are expected to identify which point/points are invariant under a transformation.

Example: Shape A is shown below. State the coordinates of any invariant points when shape A is reflected in the line x=1.

In order to see if there are any invariant points in a transformation, we need to do the transformation.

Firstly, we draw the line x=1. It is a horizontal line that passes through 1 on the x-axis.

Then, completing the reflection (either by using tracing paper or however you’d prefer), we get the picture shown below.

The reflected shape is shown in green.

As we can see, all points on the shape have moved to a different location except for 1 – the one that was located on the reflection line. Here we’ve marked this with a red X.

So, we can conclude that there is 1 invariant point, and the coordinates of it are

(1, 1).

Example: Perform the following two transformations (in this order) to shape A: rotate 180\degree about the point (1, 0); translate by the vector \begin{pmatrix} 2 \\ 2 \end{pmatrix}. Label the final shape C and state the coordinates of any invariant points.

Firstly, we need to perform the rotation. Here, we’ll mark a point at (1, 0) to note the centre of rotation, and then we’ll call the resulting shape B (see below).

Then, we have to translate by the vector

\begin{pmatrix} 2 \\ 2 \end{pmatrix}This means moving shape B 2 to the right, and then 2 up. This completes the transformation, so we label the resulting shape C. The full picture is shown below.

As we can see, once both transformations have been done to the shape, we end up with one invariant point, with coordinates

(2, 1)Here, marked with a red X.

Note: make sure that you know which corner is which. It may be the case that one corner ends up being on top of another one – this is not an invariant point – it must be the case that a point ends up in exactly the same spot it was before the transformation, not just that it ends up back on top of the shape somewhere.

## Example Questions

a) To do the enlargement, we draw lines for the origin through each of the corners of the shape, extending them twice as far to account for the scale factor 2. Then, joining the corners together, we get the enlarged shape as shown below.

b) Looking at the graph, we can see that none of the points on the triangle ended up being in their original spot. Therefore, the number of invariant points is zero.

A reflection in the line x=0 is just a reflection in the y-axis. The result of this is shown in grey below.

Then, taking this new shape and rotating it 180\degree about (0, 1) (using tracing paper or otherwise), we get the shape labelled B below.

b) Looking at the graph, we can see there is one corner of the shape that ends up in its original position. Reading off, we see that the coordinates of the invariant point are

(-4, 1)

a) The line y=x is the straight line that passes through the origin, and points such as (1, 1), (2, 2), and so on. Reflecting the shape in this line and labelling it B, we get the picture below.

b) We want to perform a translate to B to make it have two point that are invariant (with respect to shape A). To do this, we want the two sharp corners at the bottom of the arrow shapes to meet. This can be done by moving shape B left by 1 and up by 1, as shown below.

Therefore, the required transformation to get two invariant points is a translation by the vector

\begin{pmatrix} -1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}